Working Someone Else's Land
A manifesto of sorts about why the world needs The Handshake Economy
You already feel it, even if you’ve never put it into words.
Forty years of giving your best hours to someone else’s company, in exchange for a paycheck that covers the mortgage and, if you’re careful and a little lucky, a retirement that lets you stop right before your body gives out. Meanwhile, the people at the top of the org chart aren’t living that math. They’re not waiting until sixty-five. They’re not “careful and a little lucky.” They’re fine. More than fine. Some of them are on a yacht right now.
That’s not a conspiracy. Nobody designed it as cruelty. It’s just what the system was built to produce, and you happen to be standing in the part of it that produces yachts for other people.
If you’ve ever done everything right — hit the numbers, taken the extra project, stayed late, said yes — and still felt like you were running in place, you already know what I’m talking about. You don’t need me to explain feudalism to you. You’re already living a modern version of it. You just might not have had the words for it yet.
This is for you.
I spent years as a criminal investigator before I became a performance consultant, and the move was less of a leap than it sounds. Investigators and consultants do the same job in different rooms. Something is wrong. The obvious explanation is incomplete. The official story is definitely incomplete. The person closest to the problem — you — knows more than you’ve been asked. Your job is to find out what’s actually true, about the system and about yourself.
Here’s the first thing I want you to take from this, and I’ll keep saying it until it sounds obvious:
The system is working exactly as designed — just not for you.
Your stalled career, your burnout, the contentment that’s really just resignation wearing a calmer face — none of it is a character flaw. It’s the predictable output of incentives built a long time ago by people who were never thinking about you. If you don’t like the output, stop trying to fix yourself and go investigate the structure instead.
That’s the actual work. I take problems that get blamed on people and treat them as problems of design. A promotion that never comes, blamed on “not being ready,” when the real cause is that nobody was ever going to hand you the authority that role requires. A goal you keep almost-reaching, blamed on discipline, when the real cause is that the goal was never fully yours to begin with. Burnout blamed on resilience, when the real cause is a structural mismatch between what you’re giving and what you’re getting back — and no amount of yoga fixes a math problem.
But seeing the system clearly is only the first move. The second is harder:
Definitions matter.
Most people have never actually written down, in plain language, the precise distance between what they have and don’t want, and what they want and don’t have. “I’m unhappy at work” isn’t a diagnosis. It’s six different problems wearing one vague sentence, and you’ll spend years fixing the wrong one if you never separate them out.
Which brings me to the line I’ll repeat the most, because it’s the one the entire self-improvement industry violates:
Treatment without diagnosis is malpractice.
A doctor who prescribed before examining you would lose their license. The advice industry built around “you” does this constantly. Five-step morning routines arrive before anyone has asked what’s actually broken. Hustle arrives before diagnosis. This publication takes the opposite stance: the diagnosis is the work. If a post doesn’t end in a tidy action list, that’s not a failure. That’s the contract.
A few things I believe, stated plainly so you can decide whether to keep reading:
The gap between the life you’re building and the life you actually want is the most important territory you have. Most of corporate life is built to help you avoid looking at it directly.
You are almost always smarter than the system you’re operating inside of. When something isn’t working, the cause is usually upstream of you, not inside you. Stop excavating your own character for a flaw that was never there.
Frameworks are useful until they aren’t. The job isn’t to follow the framework. The job is to understand your actual situation. The framework is scaffolding, not the building.
Evidence beats opinion. Including mine. Especially mine. If something here doesn’t match your real life, trust your life over my paragraph, and write to tell me what I got wrong.
You don’t need permission to want something different. Most people inside a system like this are waiting for someone — a boss, a partner, a savings number — to give them permission to choose otherwise. The people who actually get out don’t wait for permission. They diagnose, they build a real plan, and they move.
Here’s what you can expect from me:
Posts that take a specific feeling you’ve had — the plateau, the burnout, the golden handcuffs, the promotion that keeps almost-arriving — and work it the way I’d work a case. Some will be short observations. Some will be longer investigations. Some will be arguments staked plainly, no hedge. All of them are trying to tell you something true about your situation, instead of something comfortable.
I will be wrong sometimes. When I am, I’ll say so. I’d rather be useful than impressive.
I won’t write to fill a content calendar. I’ll write when I have something worth saying — at least once a week, more likely twice. The trade for less frequency is that what lands in your inbox is worth opening.
I won’t sell you a course. I won’t sell you a certification. I won’t tell you five habits will fix your life. If I tell you something is hard, it’s because it’s hard. If I don’t tell you what to do about it yet, it’s because we haven’t finished diagnosing it.
This isn’t for everyone working a corporate job. It’s not for people looking for a pep talk, or someone to validate the version of “fine” they’ve already decided to settle for. It’s for the people who already know something’s off, who are tired of being told the fix is one more morning routine, and who actually want a way out — whether that’s the income to walk away, a creative outlet that makes staying bearable, or the plan to finally go all-in on something that’s theirs.
If you’ve read this far, you’re probably the reader.
Subscribe, and let’s find your way out.
If you are ready to do something about this, consider joining The Handshake Economy.


This really hits home. I’ve seen too many organizations blame individuals for outcomes that are baked into the system itself. The focus on diagnosis before prescription is crucial—without it, you’re just applying bandaids. I wonder, in your own workplace, how often are problems structural rather than personal, and are you noticing the patterns before you try to fix them?
Yes! And when an idea to “close the gap” comes from the lower ranks, it is usually met with “great idea” and then completely ignored.
I used to start with the assumption that everyone wants to learn from the facts and grow from there. Not everyone really wants to learn and grow, and that blows my mind.